
Annotated frames
Every detection drawn on the original imagery, so any number can be traced back to the pixel it came from.

Impact
Interventions get planned without baseline data. A survey gives them one: how much waste, what kind, where it gathers and when.
What you get back
Nothing is summarised away. The number, the frame it came from, and the frame kept for next time.

Every detection drawn on the original imagery, so any number can be traced back to the pixel it came from.

Count, footprint area and estimated mass, broken out by material. Glass and plastic are budgeted separately.

The same figures for the whole flight area, in one table you can hand to a committee.

Kept, so a later survey of the same stretch is directly comparable to this one.
Repeatability
A single survey says how much waste is on a shore today. The same method flown again at other tides and in other seasons says how it moves, and whether anything you did worked, including work far upstream. Because the pipeline is fixed, same model, same scale calculation, same reference weights, two surveys of the same stretch differ only by what actually changed on the ground.
Corrections feed back
The correction feeds back into the model, which improves on the imagery it is actually being used on rather than on a benchmark that resembles it.
What this is not
It tells you how much waste is reaching the water, what kind it is, where it gathers and roughly what it weighs. NGOs plan clean-ups with it, municipalities target collection, researchers study leakage, donors see verified impact. Removing the waste is still work for people with bags.

We process a sample survey and show you the output before you commit to anything.
Request a demo